pod2g explains the thought process involved to reach a stable jailbreak as well as handling of the execution process. It’s nice to read up on the jailbreak that all of us have been waiting so long for. Thanks for all the hard work, pod2g and the Dev-Team. Your hard work made the New Years ‘merrier’!
Remember that the jailbreak is currently only for previous A4 devices and this DOES NOT include the A5-based devices such as the iPhone 4S and iPad 2.
If you wish to learn more about the 5.0.1 jailbreak and how to jailbreak your A4 iPhone, iPad, and/or iPod Touch, check out the post on Greenpois0n.com for details and instructions.
Here’s the full excerpt of the post and you could also check out the post here.
Details on CoronaNow that Corona was released by the iPhone Dev Team and the Chronic Dev Team, I can give details about how it works.
1. the user land exploit
Apple has fixed all previous known ways of executing unsigned binaries in iOS 5.0. Corona does it another way.
By the past, the trick security researchers used was to include the untethering payload as a data page (as opposed to a code page) in the Mach-O binary. The advantage of a data page was that the Macho-O loader didn’t check its authenticity. ROP is used so that code execution happens without writing executable code but rather by utilizing existing signed code in the dyld cache. To have the ROP started by the Mach-O loader, they relied on different technics found by @comex, either :– the interposition exploit– the initializer exploit
Here is a detailed explanation of incomplete code sign tricks used before 5.0 : http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Incomplete_Codesign_Exploit
In iOS 5.0, data pages need also to be signed by Apple for the loader to authenticate the binary. @i0n1c seems to be able to pass through these verifications though (https://twitter.com/#!/i0n1c/status/145132665325105152). We may see this in the 5.1 jailbreak.
Thus, for Corona, I searched for a way to start unsigned code at boot without using the Mach-O loader. That’s why I looked for vulnerabilities in existing Apple binaries that I could call using standard launchd plist mechanisms.
Using a fuzzer, I found after some hours of work that there’s a format string vulnerability in the racoon configuration parsing code! racoon is the IPsec IKE daemon (http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net/). It comes by default with iOS and is started when you setup an IPsec connection.
Now you got it, Corona is an anagram of racoon .
By the way, the exploitation of the format string vulnerability is different than what was done in 2001, check it out if you’re interested !
For the jailbreak to be applied at boot, racoon is started by a launchd plist file, executing the command : racoon -f racoon-exploit.conf
racoon-exploit.conf is a large configuration file exploiting the format string bug to get the unsigned code started.
The format string bug is utilized to copy the ROP bootstrap payload to the memory and to execute it by overwriting a saved LR in the racoon stack by a stack pivot gadget.
The ROP bootstrap payload copies the ROP exploit payload from the payload file which is distributed with Corona then stack pivot to it. The idea is to escape from format strings as fast as possible, because they are CPU time consuming.
The ROP exploit payload triggers the kernel exploit.
2. the kernel exploit
The kernel exploit relies on an HFS heap overflow bug I found earlier. I don’t know exactly what happens in the kernel code, I never figured it out exactly, I found it by fuzzing the HFS btree parser.
I just realized that it is a heap overflow in the zone allocator, so I started to try to mount clean, overflowed and payload images in a Heap Feng Shui way And hey, that worked :p Thanks to @i0n1c for his papers on this subject. This helped me a lot. I may have given up without them.
The kernel heap overflow exploit copies 0x200 bytes from thevnimage.payload file to the kernel sysent replacing a syscall to a write anywhere gadget. Some syscalls (first 0xA0 bytes and the last 0x6 bytes) are trashed in the operation because I needed to respect the HFS protocol.
Thus, I restore them as fast as possible to get a stable exploit, then the write anywhere is used to copy the kernel exploit and jump to it.
The kernel exploit just patches the kernel security features, as usual. Nothing interesting there.
Happy New Year 2012 to you all, thanks a lot for the donations.
Image Source: Funky Space Monkey